Last verified: April 2026
The New Tax
Michigan’s new 24% wholesale excise tax took effect January 1, 2026. The tax was added by 2025 legislation on top of the existing MRTMA tax structure:
- 10% retail excise tax on adult-use sales (existing, MRTMA)
- 6% Michigan sales tax on adult-use sales (existing, MRTMA)
- 24% wholesale excise tax on wholesale transfers from cultivators / processors to retailers (new, January 1, 2026)
The combined effective tax rate at retail rises substantially. Industry expects a 14–16% market-wide sales decline in the months following the tax’s effective date.
Why the Tax
The 2025 legislation justifying the wholesale tax was driven by two pressures:
- State revenue needs — Michigan’s adult-use cannabis market has grown to $12.5B+ cumulative since 2019; legislators sought to capture more revenue from the maturing market
- Caregiver-market pressure — the unlicensed caregiver gray market has continued to compete with licensed operators on price; some legislators argued the wholesale tax would reduce the caregiver competitive advantage by capturing more revenue from licensed transactions
The legislative theory was that adult-use cannabis demand is relatively price-inelastic at modest tax increases, so the state would capture more revenue without proportionally reducing legal-market sales. Industry analysis disputes this theory and predicts substantial demand displacement to caregiver, gray-market, and adjacent-state sources.
Effects on Detroit Cannabis Operators
The wholesale tax falls hardest on:
- Retail-only operators who source product from licensed cultivators — the wholesale-tax markup compounds margin pressure
- Smaller operators with limited pricing power against larger statewide brands
- Detroit Legacy / social-equity operators who already carried higher real-estate and compliance costs — the tax shock can push marginal operators into unprofitability
The tax falls less hard on:
- Vertically integrated statewide brands (House of Dank, JARS, Lume, TerrAscend / Gage) that own grow, processing, and retail operations — the tax can be absorbed across the integrated chain
- Microbusinesses that are vertically integrated by design
- Caregiver gray-market operators who do not pay the wholesale tax at all
The structural asymmetry — wholesale tax falling on retail-only operators while sparing vertically-integrated brands and unlicensed caregivers — is a primary critique driving the MCIA lawsuit. See Tax Lawsuit.
Effects on Detroit Consumers
Detroit cannabis consumers are likely to see:
- Higher retail prices — the wholesale tax markup will be passed through to retail to varying degrees depending on operator competitive positioning
- Some price compression at the lower-quality end of the product spectrum, where caregiver-grown gray-market alternatives are most price-competitive
- Some product-mix shifts — consumers may shift toward concentrates and edibles (which deliver higher THC per dollar of taxable wholesale value) and away from flower
- Possible cross-border consumption shifts — though the federal-jurisdiction issue at Detroit-Windsor border crossings constrains this option
The 14–16% Sales Decline Projection
The 14–16% market-wide sales decline projection from industry analysts assumes:
- Substantial demand displacement to caregiver gray market
- Some demand displacement to adjacent-state purchases (though Indiana, Ohio, and adjacent jurisdictions are not adult-use legal at scale)
- Some demand reduction at the margin from price-sensitive consumers
- No federal SAFE Banking or Schedule III rescheduling that would offset operator costs
The actual sales decline through 2026 will depend on competitive dynamics, the MCIA lawsuit’s outcome, federal-policy developments, and consumer-behavior responses.
Detroit Tax Revenue
Detroit, as the state’s largest adult-use jurisdiction by license count, receives substantial revenue from MRTMA’s statutory revenue-sharing. Per Michigan Treasury data, Detroit received approximately $3.3 million in cannabis tax revenue sharing for FY2025. The 2026 wholesale tax adds a new revenue stream at the state level; the share allocated to Detroit through the existing revenue-sharing formula will be a 2026 fiscal-policy question.
The Schedule III Wildcard
The December 18, 2025 federal executive order directing the Attorney General to expedite cannabis’s move to Schedule III could partially offset the wholesale-tax effect on operators by:
- Removing the Internal Revenue Code § 280E tax-deduction restriction that currently prevents cannabis businesses from deducting normal business expenses
- Easing some federal banking-relationship friction
- Reducing federal research-and-development barriers
As of April 2026, cannabis remains Schedule I. The rescheduling timeline is uncertain.
What to Watch
- Q2 / Q3 2026 sales data — CRA monthly statistical reports will confirm or refute the 14–16% sales decline projection
- MCIA lawsuit outcome — if successful, the wholesale tax could be invalidated
- Federal Schedule III completion — would offset some operator costs
- Detroit operator survival rates — whether the Detroit Legacy / social-equity operators survive the combined pressure
For in-depth cannabis education, dosing guides, safety information, and research summaries, visit our partner site TryCannabis.org
Related on this site: Send a Message, Contact DetroitCannabis.org, About DetroitCannabis.org.